The Babadook (2014)
A suffocating bedtime nightmare that turns grief into something that won’t stay on the page.

At a Glance
- Director: Jennifer Kent
- Cast: Essie Davis, Noah Wiseman, Daniel Henshall
- Subgenres: Psychological Horror, Supernatural Horror, Haunted House Horror, Social Horror, Monster Horror, Isolation Horror
- Tone & Style: Atmospheric, Slow burn, Character-driven, Bleak, Art-house leaning
- Best For: Viewers drawn to intimate, emotionally raw horror that prioritizes dread over jump scares.
- Not ideal for: Anyone looking for fast pacing, conventional scares, or clear-cut monster mythology.
- Country of production: Australia
- Language: English
Release Date: November 2014 (U.S. theatrical)
Runtime: 94 minutes
Rating: R for disturbing violence and frightening images
Rotten Tomatoes: Critics 98% • Audience 72%
Metacritic: Critics 86 • User 7.5
Letterboxd: 3.3 / 5
EncoreCraft Score: 88 / 100
Where to Watch: View current streaming availability on JustWatch
EncoreCraft Breakdown (0–10)
- Rewatch Value: 8 / 10
- Scare Factor: 8 / 10
- Performances: 10 / 10
- Violence and Disturbance: 7 / 10
- Pacing: 8 / 10

Synopsis
Amelia, a widowed mother still reeling from personal loss, struggles to raise her troubled young son Samuel in a quiet suburban home. When a mysterious pop-up book appears on their bookshelf, its eerie presence begins to unsettle their already fragile household.
As Samuel becomes increasingly fixated on the story’s shadowy figure, the boundaries between imagination and reality begin to thin. The house starts to feel less like a refuge and more like something quietly observing them, amplifying every moment of tension and fear.

Spoiler-Free Review
The first sensation The Babadook creates is not fear, but pressure. Every scene feels slightly too tight, every silence stretched just long enough to make restlessness creep in. The film announces itself quietly, letting discomfort accumulate before it ever gestures toward outright horror.
Living inside Amelia’s daily routine quickly becomes exhausting, and very deliberately so. Sleepless nights, social isolation, and a child who cannot turn off his alarmed imagination form a loop that never quite resets. The experience mirrors that exhaustion, pulling the audience into a headspace where relief feels temporary and fragile.
Essie Davis carries the film with a performance that never asks for sympathy, yet earns it through sheer exposure and vulnerability. Her face becomes a battleground where irritation, guilt, fear, and denial overlap in real time. Noah Wiseman’s Samuel, shrill and erratic by intention, pushes every interaction toward collapse without ever feeling like a narrative shortcut.
The house itself feels less like a setting and more like an active presence. Narrow hallways, muted colors, and heavy shadows give the impression that space is closing in rather than simply being occupied. Sound design plays a crucial role here, using mundane noises to suggest that something is always slightly out of sync.
Rather than escalating through traditional scares, the film tightens by repetition. The same routines replay with small variations, each one more frayed than the last. When fear does surface, it feels earned, emerging naturally from the emotional strain rather than interrupting it.
What ultimately justifies the high EncoreCraft Score is how completely the film commits to its tone. It refuses easy catharsis and never undercuts its bleakness with relief humor or spectacle. The result is a horror experience that lingers not because of what it shows, but because of what it makes the viewer sit with.
Craft Notes & Background (Non-Spoiler)
- Director Jennifer Kent previously worked as an assistant to Lars von Trier, an influence often cited in the film’s uncompromising tone.
- The story originated from Kent’s 2005 short film Monster, which explored similar themes of motherhood and repression.
- The pop-up book was designed specifically for the film, with multiple versions created for different stages of wear and damage.
- Most of the film was shot in Adelaide, Australia, using a limited number of locations to reinforce the sense of confinement.
- The muted color palette was inspired by early German expressionist cinema and children’s illustrations.
- The score relies heavily on ambient sound and minimal musical cues rather than traditional melodic themes.
- The film premiered at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival before gaining wider theatrical release.
- Essie Davis has cited the role as one of the most emotionally demanding performances of her career.
⚠️ ⚠️ SPOILERS BELOW ⚠️ ⚠️
The rest of this review discusses the full plot and ending.
⚠️ ⚠️ SPOILERS BELOW ⚠️ ⚠️
Full Plot Recap (Spoilers)
Amelia’s unresolved grief over her husband’s death slowly curdles into anger toward her son, whose birth coincided with the fatal accident. Samuel’s fear of the Babadook intensifies as Amelia’s emotional control erodes, creating a feedback loop where each feeds the other’s instability.
As the Babadook’s presence grows more intrusive, Amelia begins losing time, experiencing blackouts and violent impulses she refuses to fully acknowledge as her own. The house becomes a sealed environment where external help is pushed away, leaving mother and son isolated with whatever has taken hold.
When Amelia fully succumbs to the influence of the entity, she turns on Samuel, embodying the threat he has been warning against. The confrontation forces her to face the reality of her suppressed grief and the harm it has caused.
By confronting the Babadook rather than attempting to destroy it, Amelia regains control. The entity is confined rather than eliminated, suggesting a fragile equilibrium rather than a clean victory.
The film closes with mother and son settling into a new, uneasy normal. The horror is no longer hidden or denied, but managed through acknowledgment and care.
Spoiler Analysis
What makes the ending unsettling is not simply that the monster survives, but that its presence must be accepted as permanent. The film argues that some forms of pain do not disappear through confrontation alone, they require ongoing attention.
Amelia’s possession feels less like an invasion and more like a surrender. The horror emerges from how easily untreated grief reshapes behavior, turning protection into threat without the need for external justification.
Samuel’s role shifts from nuisance to anchor. His refusal to ignore the monster forces the truth into the open, making him the catalyst for survival rather than its obstacle.
By refusing a definitive cure, the film leaves the audience with an uncomfortable honesty. Healing is shown as maintenance rather than transformation, a conclusion that lingers longer and cuts deeper than any final scare.